All our users' most frequently asked questions about arc-flash risk
It is the result of an electrical short circuit conducted through the air. It is a violent release of thermal energy from an electrical source, which can cause serious or even fatal burns or injuries. On an electrical panel, the risks of an Arc Flash become a major concern from 220 volts AC upwards.
The difference lies in the consequence related to the accident. In the case of electric shock, we refer to injuries caused by an electric current passing through the body, whereas electrocution refers to death resulting from an electric shock.
An Arc Flash can reach up to 18,000°C, which is about three times the heat of the sun’s surface.
The risks associated with Arc Flash exposure are numerous:
An Arc Flash can occur in various environments, whether related to electrical installations or structures, starting from a nominal voltage of 220 Volts AC. Here are some examples :
It is crucial to follow safety and maintenance protocols and to wear suitable PPE to protect users from the consequences of accidents and to minimise Arc Flash risks in these environments.
A Flash Arc can occur when electricity jumps across a gap between two conductors or between a conductor and a conductive surface (such as the ground or a metal enclosure). Several conditions can lead to an Arc Flash :
From 220 Volts AC.
It may seem that LV (Low Voltage) poses no Arc Flash hazard, but that’s not true ! Even in ELV (Extra Low Voltage), the risk is present.
There are several :
It defines the protection requirements – which means that it :
It is important not to forget the notion of responsibility – the employer must request this analysis from qualified persons or organisations.
Only a recognised organisation or qualified individuals are authorised to carry out the risk analysis. The employer must request the analysis from these organisations to define the protection requirements.
The incident energy related to an Arc Flash is expressed in cal/cm² (calories per square centimetre).
No, it is not possible to establish a link between ATPV (Arc Thermal Performance Value) and APC (Arc Protection Class) because they are two separate test methods (not the same testing facilities, nor the same result measurement units).
OPEN ARC Method : EC 61482-1-1
Determines ATPV and ELIM values of PPE in cal/cm² (American principle).
This is the most representative test method, and the most realistic. It simulates thermal effects on the human body, expressed in cal/cm².
Applies to a wide range of incident energy levels.
BOX TEST Method : IEC 61482-1-2
Determines two PPE protection classes, depending on the electrical installation’s intensity (European principle) :
APC 1* : 4 kA for 0.5 s at 30 cm
APC 2* : 7 kA for 0.5 s at 30 cm
Test based on current intensity/density, classifying PPE into two levels, up to 7 kA. Not valid for installations above 7 kA.
NB : It does not simulate actual thermal effects on the body. Only applies to electrical installations.
*Arc Protection Class
Yes, there is a link because these two values are obtained using the same test method, but they reflect two different interpretations of the result.
→ The maximum thermal energy the PPE can withstand with a 50 % probability of second-degree burns. Expressed in cal/cm².
→ The maximum thermal energy the PPE can withstand with only a 1 % probability of second-degree burns. Expressed in cal/cm².
Follow the recommendations in the product-specific instructions for use.